Aug 31, 2018

Shanghai Leadership Camp Reflection

1 comment

 

Shanghai Leadership Project Survey 2018

Grace Zhao

Round 1

 

1. What was good about your* leadership project, what do you need to improve?

 

Our topic was too broad, though interesting. The judges seemed to like more involvement in the project (Getting a professional opinion, getting field experience, taking surveys, etc.) It would have been better if our group members were situated in a closer range, unlike the Chinese students who worked in groups mainly based off their school giving them better communication and collaboration. It would have been better if we had been able to have more time to translate more of our project into Chinese since the translators could only give a brief overview.

 

2. How where the Chinese projects different from ours (The international/american ones)?

 

They were focused on small, but serious topics, mainly based on China’s problems. Obviously, they had a better understanding of Chinese, so the judges were able to understand them better, therefore earning a higher score. They had a lot more information on their problems and had a lot more involvement. They seemed to take it more seriously while many of the international students took it less so.

 

Round 2

 

1.What was good about Round 2 and how could it have been improved?

 

Round 2 was fun, since one of my roommates were in the same group as I was and I have a pretty good understanding of Chinese and am able to speak it fluently (with the exception of a few words). However, when it came to the actual research part of the project I was unable to help due to my amateurish understanding of writing and reading Chinese. It could have been improved if the Americans were able to work together on a separate project, although that may have lead to the same problem of the judges being unable to understand our projects and lead to less collaboration and communication between American and Chinese students.

 

Round 3

 

1.Did you like the questions/topics of the third round?

 

Yes, though the others in my group may have had a different opinion.

 

2. How could Round 3 have been improved?

There could have been a choice of three different topics (or more depending on the amount of students) that people would have been interested in like entertainment or something instead of Facebook’s denial of restricting posts on Nazi massacres that some students seemed to be confused about or had little to no interest in. Also, one of the people in my debating group in round 3 had trouble understanding the topic and the provided information.

 

Overall

 

1.What did you like about the Leadership Project? (Subjects, projects, communication, etc.)

 

Since I had an adequate understanding of Chinese and was able to speak it fluently communication wasn’t a big problem, unlike some of the other students who struggled to understand despite the translators. The subjects for Round 2 were broad but allowed discussion in order to choose a topic within the subject. Round 3 was mostly independent but was based off of group work and coming to a conclusion by debating the given topic that gave us a brief overview of the problem. It was fun to discuss and debate the general topic with others. Communication was fine in Round 3 since it was a group of American projects; though Round 2 had some complications.

 

2. How was the camp in general? (Food, rooms, friends, etc.)

 

The rooms were ok, though it got a little hot and some were smelly. My roommates welcomed me and introduced me to some of their friends.The food was fine although some of the other students seemed to enjoy Cup Noodles more. Many people were friendly and seemed interested that we came from the US, although it was immensely amusing to see their reactions when they realized I could speak Chinese and understand them. Overall, it was a rather enjoyable experience especially the last day where all the school groups and the international/American group held a show which many people seemed to had fun participating in. The last day people hung out at other rooms and some held mini-parties. Also the milk tea from the store is awesome.

 

3. What could have been improved overall?

 

Time. Time was a huge issue due to the fact that for the last performance and most of the rounds the international group needed more time to work and prepare unlike the Chinese groups who already knew about the general subject and what the rounds would be based off of. Communication was another huge problem for most of the students; the judges couldn’t understand us when we explained our projects in English, some students had trouble understanding the judge’s questions and others struggled to communicate with the Chinese students at all. The translators were helpful but most of the time it boiled down to the other students who had a good grasp on the language to explain what was happening and what they had said.

 

4. How has camp influenced you?

 

It really hasn’t “influenced me” but I have made many new friends and had a good time in general. The Shanghai Sightseeing Tour allowed independence, though we had assigned meet up times and usually traveled in groups for safety. It was also just fun in general.

 

5. What would you recommend to others about the Leadership project?

 

I would tell them to come if they can communicate well, or at least understand Chinese though it would be fine if you came just for the experience. It’s fun to talk with other students and the Chinese students. If you like to interact with other people and talk about interesting and impactful topics you should definitely come.

 

P.S. Try the milk tea. Just don't do what I did and not eat for three days and live off the tea instead.

 

*The project you created or joined for the first round.

Aug 31, 2018

I just got back to the U.S. so it took longer than I expected to post.

New Posts
  • I had a great time at the Qingdao Leadership Convention. It was really interesting to meet new people from a different culture. Everyone felt very welcoming and friendly. For the first round, we worked with students from China and we had to learn how to work together even though we were not together very much. The Q&A section of our presentation was a little disappointing because we were told that there would be a translator but there wasn't anyone there to help us translate. This made it difficult for us to understand the questions and for us to effectively communicate our answers. The second round was the most challenging. Again, it was difficult to communicate with the Chinese students, but I was very fortunate to have a nice group. They tried to help me understand what they were discussing, however the subject that they were discussing was not one that I could relate to because of our cultures. I tried to contribute as much as I could but I felt that I was generally a useless member of their group. Despite all of this, I still learned a lot from this experience and had a lot of fun.
  • The Qingdao camp was very interesting. Actually, a week before the camp had started, I wasn't even aware there was more than one round. I had honestly thought that the project we started working on before was the entire competition. I worked in a group with Priscilla Wu and five Chinese students. Our topic was regarding peer support in depression. We didn't get a lot of time to practice presenting together, less than a couple hours, but the presentation ended up going very well. Our group even go to present a second time for the final round of the first round. I'm not sure if I remember correctly, but I think our team got 11th place. While I was obviously disappointed we didn't score higher, I was definately proud there we were able to make it to the final around. I think the part of the first round that made me the most nervous was the Q&A portion. Fortunately, I didn't end up having to answer any questions. The first time we presented however, our translator spoke very quietly and I had a really hard time hearing her, so I didn't understand what the judges were asking regardless. The second time, our translator translated everything using a microphone before we answered, and then also translated the answers for us, so I understood more the second time. The presentation itself was also fine, although I'm a little embarrassed to admit that the second time we presented, I completely forgot what I was supposed to say for one of the slides. Overall, presenting was fine, though. The second round was my least favorite of all three rounds because there wasn't anyone in my team that could clearly speak or understand English, not even my coach. It wasn't helpful that our presentation topic was a very strange one. In the end, the only way I contributed at all to the second round was presenting one slide. The language barrier was extremely apparent here. The third round, however, was my favorite!! I think I had the most fun during the debate, mostly because I like to have discussions like that. I think the biggest issue during our debate was that we kept interrupting each other, although not maliciously or on purpose. The judges, supposedly, really liked our debate. I really enjoyed this camp, and I made a lot of good friends though it that I, hopefully, remain in contact with for a very long time.
  • The Qingdao Leadership Convention was a really fun experience and I learned a lot. It was quite different from the 2018 convention in Shanghai, even though it was the same organization. For the first round, we worked with Chinese students and learned about how they work together and present. When we actually went to present, we were a little surprised by how small the stage was, especially compared to last year. We could barely fit all our team members on stage! What was even more surprising was the Q&A part. Some questions were really hard and irrelevant to our project. For the second round, I was able to meet a lot of different people and learn about the work styles of different people and how to work with these different styles. At first, my group wasn't very accepting of me. For the Gold of Desert King event, I realized that I had a very interesting group. Mainly a small group did all the work while the rest of the group did meaningless tasks, which slowly became the rest of the group going on their phones. When we actually started on the project, the group worked in the same way. Only after our coach told them that they could use the Hong Kong and American student did they include us, but they only asked us about our experiences in the US and HK. When I asked them what I could do to help, they always told me that there wasn't anything they needed help with. Because of this, more than half of the group spent the time on their phones. However, towards the end, the rest of the group was able to contribute more and we became closer as a group. For the third round, It was quite similar to last year, but the topic was much less controversial. We also discussed the topic before going on stage. Compared to last year, I definitely built closer relationships with the other students, both American and Chinese, that came to the convention.

© 2018 by ICBG

  • w-facebook
  • Twitter Clean
  • White Google+ Icon